AIMS #CM01: Spontaneous beating wild type hiPSC-ventricular cardiomyocyte field potential assay for compound testing and/or disease modeling
Last revised: Dec 2, 2024

Together with key opinion leaders in academia and in industry, we have incorporated [1] our experiences with hiPSC-cardiomyocytes in our respective labs, [2] our work with international consortia developing hiPSC-cardiomyocyte assays (CiPA and JiCSA), and [3] published data, to develop a proposed standard. This standard focuses on the hiPSC-cardiomyocyte spontaneous beat rate, features of the cardiac waveform (depolarization spike amplitude and field potential duration), and the synchronization of activity in the syncytia. Cell performance data from leading commercial sources of hiPSC-cardiomyocytes with respect to this proposed standard are also presented for reference.
>> A wild type hiPSC-ventricular cardiomyocyte batch of cells is considered to have met the Axion Induced Model Standard (AIMS) when:
≥80% of the wells seeded with these hiPSC-ventricular cardiomyocytes meet all four of the following well acceptance criteria:
- For convenience, when using a 24-well plate this would be ≥20 wells, for a 48-well plate ≥39 wells, and a 96-well plate ≥77 wells.
- ≥80% was set as the threshold because lower than this level makes the cost of running the assay prohibitively expensive (cost/well).
- Wells that don’t meet these criteria due to operator error (e.g., due to an error in loading the cells into the MEA plate) will be discarded from this percentage success rate calculation as the impacted well is not an accurate reflection of the cell type’s performance.
1. Synchronized beating across ≥50% electrodes in a well.
- For convenience, when using a 24-well plate this would be ≥8 electrodes, for a 48-well plate ≥8 electrodes, and a 96-well plate ≥4 electrodes.
- The synchronized beating should initiate from a single point of origin, where the interelectrode beat time delay increases monotonically as a function of distance from the origin. More than one patch of spontaneous beating iPSC-CMs in a well is undesirable and is indicative of a poorly coupled syncytium. The competing spontaneous activity can confound the analysis of the results. Consequently, if a well has two or more independent patches of spontaneously beating iPSC-CMs in the baseline recording, this well should be discarded.
2. Spontaneous Beat Period of 750-3000 ms (i.e. 20-80 beats per minute, BPM).
- The acceptable beat period range is wide. However, rationale for this range was inferred from the CiPA Pilot Study [Millard et. al. 2018] which used hiPSC-CMs from two vendors with spontaneous beat periods at the two extremes of this range (ref. Figure 2). Although the spontaneous activity of these two cell types differed significantly, consistent concentration-dependent effects were observed for both cell types (ref. Figure 5).
- Working with hiPSC-CMs with spontaneous beat periods greater than 3000 ms can be impractical due to the longer recording periods required to capture sufficient beating events for analysis data sets.
- Primary ventricular CMs should not spontaneously beat, and the spontaneous beating observed in hiPSC-ventricular CMs is often attributed to their “immaturity.” Efforts to enhance the “maturation” of hiPSC-ventricular CMs are ongoing and can result in spontaneous beat periods greater than 3000 ms. For assays involving these hiPSC-CMs, external pacing (via electrical- or light-induced means) will probably be required to make these cells more practical to work with. A paced hiPSC-CM assay could be the subject of a future AIMS but is beyond the scope of this AIMS.
- Note: AIMS, #CM01, is specifically for hiPSC-ventricular CMs and not hiPSC-atrial CMs. Studies have shown that hiPSC-atrial CMs can often have a spontaneous beat period less than 750 ms [Thorpe et. al., 2023] (ref. Figure 2).
3. Corrected Field Potential Duration (FPDc) of 200-700 ms.
- Where the Field Potential Duration (FPD) is corrected using the Fridericia correction:
- FPDc = FPD/Beat Period0.33
- The acceptable FPDc range is wide. However, rationale for this range was inferred from the CiPA Pilot Study [Millard et. al. 2018] which used hiPSC-CMs from two vendors with FPDc at the two extremes of this range (ref. Figure 2). Although the FPDc of these two cell types differed significantly, consistent concentration-dependent effects were observed for both cell types (ref. Figure 5).
4. Spike Amplitude of ≥0.5 mV on ≥50% electrodes in a well.
- 0.5 mV was set as the threshold for spike amplitude as this allows for reliable capture of the spontaneous hiPSC-CM activity in baseline and could also accommodate a significant compound-induced decrease in spike amplitude.
- For studies focused on compound-induced effects on spike amplitude, a spike amplitude of ≥1.0 mV would be preferable to provide a larger assay window.

>> Additional points to consider:
A. Spontaneous beat regularity
Regularity of spontaneous hiPSC-CM beating was identified as an important factor in the quality of a hiPSC-CM recording. However, this parameter (sometimes measured as coefficient of variance of the beat period) is less commonly reported in the literature [Clements & Thomas, 2014] (ref. Figure 3). Consequently, the Review Team did not feel comfortable setting acceptance criteria relating to beat regularity at this time, but this will be something to consider should this AIMS be refined in the future.
B. Cell culture protocol
The reproducibility and quality of the hiPSC-CM model’s functional activity is dependent on the cell culture conditions. Consequently, the cell provider must specify the following details in their recommended protocol:
- Temperature of the environmental chamber in the Maestro MEA system (e.g., 37.0oC).
- CO2 concentration in the environmental chamber in the Maestro MEA system (e.g., 5.0%).
- Cell culture medium that the MEA recordings should be performed in (e.g., RPMI 1640/B27 medium).
- When the cell culture medium should be refreshed prior to the MEA recording (e.g., a full-medium change 4 hours prior to baseline acquisition).
- Equilibration time given between docking the MEA plate on the Maestro MEA system and the start of the recording (e.g., 10 minutes).
- The experimental window, i.e. the specific timeframe within which the hiPSC-CMs will perform as claimed (e.g., between 7-14 days post-thaw; or day 25-30 post-differentiation; etc.).
- Recommended appropriate positive and negative controls for the response of interest, with expected responses detailed for the former (e.g., application of the hERG K+ channel blocker, E-4031, at 100 nM should result in a ≥20% increase in the FPDc).
>> Below is a list of cell models that have been self-certificated by the vendor to meet the AIMS #CM01 criteria:
iCell Cardiomyocytes2, 01434, FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc.
Catalog Number(s): R1017 (5M cells plus media); R1059 (1.25M cells plus media); C1016 (5M cells only); C1058 (1.25M cells only)
AIMS CM#01 requirements:

Cell specific information:
- Differentiated from an FCDI reprogrammed human iPSC line
- Apparently Healthy Normal Caucasian Female Donor 01434
- >95% pure Human Cardiomyocytes
- Mixture of Ventricular, Atrial, and Nodal cells
- Preferred hiPSC-CM model used and validated during the CiPA studies
Recommended protocol:
Download Protocol
- Temperature on Maestro Pro MEA system is 37 ºC and CO2 concentration is 5.0%.
- Cells should be maintained in iCell Cardiomyocytes Maintenance Medium (M1003). Cells can be assayed in this same medium, otherwise serum-free options are available including iCell Cardiomyocytes Serum-Free Assay Medium (M1038) or iCell Cardiotox Assay Medium (M1039).
- Recommended assay window for testing iCell Cardiomyocytes2 is Day 4-7 post-thaw.
- On the day of assay, perform 100% media change and wait for 2-4 hours to begin testing.
- Equilibrate MEA plate for 10 minutes prior to baseline recording on MEA system.
- Recommended positive control compounds are E-4031 (100 nM) or Dofetilide (30 nM). hERG block always prolongs FPD by at least 25-40% after 30 min post-dose recording. Negative control is 0.1% DMSO.
Recommend select publications:
- Millard D et. al. Cross-Site Reliability of Human Induced Pluripotent stem cell-derived Cardiomyocyte Based Safety Assays Using Microelectrode Arrays: Results from a Blinded CiPA Pilot Study. Toxicol Sci. 2018 Aug 1;164(2):550-562. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy110.
- Blinova K et. al. International Multisite Study of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Drug Proarrhythmic Potential Assessment. Cell Rep. 2018 Sep 25;24(13):3582-3592. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.079.
- Patel D et. al. Assessment of Proarrhythmic Potential of Drugs in Optogenetically Paced Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes. Toxicol Sci. 2019 Jul 1;170(1):167-179. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz076.
axoCells™ Human iPSC-Derived Ventricular Cardiomyocytes, Axol Bioscience
Catalog Number(s): ax2508
AIMS CM#01 requirements:

Cell specific information:
- Ventricular cardiomyocytes made from iPSCs generated from a 74 year-old male donor’s pulmonary fibroblasts.
- Validated against all 28 CiPA compounds
Recommended protocol:
Download Protocol
Recommend select publications:
- Kanade P P et al. Effects of low temperature on electrophysiology and mechanophysiology of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). Micro and Nano Syst Lett 9, 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40486-021-00135-2
>> Reviewers:
Axion BioSystems would like to thank the following reviewers who helped shape this AIMS:
- Cristina Altrocchi - Principal Scientist Safety Pharmacology, J&J Innovative Medicine, Belgium
- Devon Guerrelli – Researcher, Children’s National Research Institute, USA
- Adam Hill - Head, Computational Cardiology Laboratory, Deputy Director Victor Chang Cardiovascular Innovation Centre, Australia
- Nikki Posnack - Principal Investigator, Children’s National Research Institute, USA
- Chris Strock - Vice President US ADMET Operations, Cyprotex, USA
- Takashi Yoshinaga - Executive Director, Advanced Biosignal Safety Assessment, Eisai, Japan
- Mike Clements - SVP, Axion BioSystems, USA
>> Acknowledgements:
Axion BioSystems would like to thank the following for their help reviewing this AIMS: Daniel Millard, Stacie Chvatal, Anthony Nicolini, Parker Ellingson, and Rika Yamazaki.